Tuesday, August 12, 2008

The Commish Tells It Like It Is

This from Commissioner Jon Draud in Business First of Louisville:

Public schools will have heavy burden in next few years

Tighten your belts, it’s going to be a rough couple of years in Kentucky public education. That’s the best advice I have after analyzing education funding in the most recent state budget.

The 2009-10 budget places a heavy burden on public school administrators, teachers, staff, parents, students and communities across the state. This two-year budget does not provide adequate state funding for public education and threatens to hinder progress being made in many districts.

Cuts coming

The Council for Better Education, whose membership is made up of most of the state’s superintendents, has predicted that many districts will be forced to cut teaching staff. A recent survey by the Kentucky School Boards Association indicates that this prediction has come true.

Other education-advocacy groups fear that ground gained in moving Kentucky students to proficiency and beyond and preparing students for successful careers will be lost without increased financial support.

Even if P-12 education had been spared any funding cuts for the 2008-10 biennium, Kentucky still would lag behind other states in the area of public school financing.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, based on 2003-04 data, Kentucky ranked dead last in per capita expenditures of state and local governments for public schools.

While spending great amounts of public money doesn’t guarantee high student achievement, there is a direct correlation between careful use of state funding and high student performance.

My challenge to Kentucky policymakers and Kentuckians everywhere is to stop thinking of education and economic health as simply having a tenuous connection. They are inseparable — the viability of one has a direct effect on the strength of the other.

Children should come first

This is not as much about funding as it is about a philosophy that children are important and that their education should be our primary concern. The budget does not reflect the concern for children, families and communities that exists in Kentucky.

The legislature developed the best budget it could with the monies available. However, Kentucky needs additional revenue to fund public education programs that have proven successful in helping students reach high levels of achievement. We must have additional revenue to help schools that are struggling to their goals by 2014, the deadline mandated by state and federal laws.

I feel a sense of urgency to re-ignite excitement across Kentucky for the work done by Kentucky educators. Kentucky teachers and administrators are moving Kentucky education in the right direction.

According to a report released last school year by the Kentucky Long-Term Policy Research Center, Kentucky moved from 43rd nationally in 1992 to 34th nationally in 2005, based on an index rating created to measure progress. We know from results on national and state assessments that Kentucky students, on average, are making steady progress.

However, there is growing apathy for public education in Kentucky. We need to get Kentucky’s business and industry leaders involved in supporting public education the way they did in the early days of reform. We need the support of parents, community leaders and our education-partner groups to help make Kentucky’s education system among the best in the nation.

More commitment is needed

I have talked with Kentucky superintendents this summer about a program that appears to be gathering strong support for public education in northern Kentucky.

Last fall, the group hosted a northern Kentucky community summit titled Champions for Education: Focus Locally, Compete Globally.” The one-day event brought together a diverse group of more than 800 people to examine the issues facing public school districts and post-secondary institutions in the region. Participants also discussed issues related to preparing students with a rigorous education that will allow them to compete in a global economy.

What would it mean in every region of the state if 800 people representing several school districts made a two-year commitment like that? Imagine that level of support from business, community and local government leaders, parents and grandparents, educators and factory workers.

Across Kentucky, local business and community leaders, Chamber of Commerce members, local merchants, civic group leaders, school council members, retired teachers, church groups and PTAs want to help but just don’t know what to do. School leaders can call upon these partners to help make such regional summits possible.

Coming together to talk about education — from early childhood education to creating a work force — and its importance to the economic health of local communities is a conversation that is long overdue.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

The "Commish" Tells It Like It Isn't

It's sad that the "Commish" continues to cite his "last place" nonsense as a US Census Bureau analysis. This stuff actually comes from an NEA report that uses the wrong Census data for such comparisons. Instead of being data from an unbiased source, these inflamatory numbers clearly come from a group with an agenda.

For the latest real Census analysis, go to http://www2.census.gov/govs/school/06f33pub.pdf. You won't find Kentucky in last place on any of the real US Census Bureau's ranking tables (Tables 11 and 12 in this report). Check it out.

This last place "stuff" absolutely does not come from the Census Bureau. I told the KDE this some time ago. Apparently, they don't care to even get their citations correct.

Anonymous said...

I reading on some other blogs that Drauds reasoning in this article is not based on accurate information. Could the owner of this blog clarify these issues?

Richard Day said...

More than one? Which?

I'm happy to respond more fully, but I can't get into it until later this evening. School is starting soon and I've got "stuff" today.

Richard Day said...

Anonymous:

Well heck, if I don't write about it now, I'm just going to think about it instead of doing my other work so here goes...

This is perhaps the blogosphere's favorite game - competing data sets. The accompanying rhetoric is chosen to support one's pre-determined conclusion.

Just pick the data set that supports the story one you want to tell, and call everything else biased...ignoring one's own biases...as though they don't exist.

Cool, huh?

But that's part of the problem associated with knowing how to read a report but never having the experience of dealing with the complex realities public school folks face every day.

That lack of real experience forces laymen to treat reports as though they are "truth."

Those of us who have served in Kentucky schools since the 70s don't need reports to describe what we have been through. We know how far Kentucky has come and could not be persuaded otherwise. Is that a bias? You bet. But it comes from reality which is a lot closer to truth than anything non-educators will experience.

Passing a law that says schools will make social and educational problem go away and then underfunding that effort is the worst kind of hypocrisy. And Draud is exactly correct to point out that Kentucky is in for a rough ride.

As conservative American education icon William Torrey Harris understood, extolling the virtues of universal education is one thing...but providing it is quite another. It's always easier to sit back and take pot shots while acting shocked that the underfunded effort produces less than the politicians' promised effect.

As for the particular claim: Dick Innes, who comments above, calls KDE on the use of the statistic Draud quoted everytime they use it. Draud correctly says it comes from the NEA (NEA's 2007 Rankings & Statistics document) - and Innes suggests that it is necessarily biased as a result.

The NEA got its data from the census bureau. But Dick cites a competing data set (above), also from the census bureau, that points toward a different conclusion. He doesn't mention BGI'S biases. But uses loaded words throughout his commentary. Inflamatory! Biased! ...like that.

By the way, have I mentioned my own biases?

I believe that the strength of America was built largely on the ideal of universal education for all citizens, something private school promoters showed little interest in historically. To many, the immigrant rabble needed to be "civilized" but not elevated. I believe a prosperous future is also dependent on even higher quality education for all.

So to me, it hardly matters if Kentucky ranked 50th or 44th on some report. Both are a long way from 25th - which ought to be the absolute minimum criteria for any system that claims to desire high quality education for its citizens.

Anonymous said...

The "Commish" has not told the entire story...if Governor does not pass the casino and cigarette tax, draconian cuts will be forthcoming.

State's current budget deficits need not only more tax dollars, but first they need state expenses to be cut by $1 billion over next 4years before contemplating raising more tax revenues!

Homestead exemptions, farmland use act programs which rob state budget must be drastically reduced from the estimated $750 million annual cost.

Kentucky's tax base is obsolete and should be addressed before raising any tax revenues is addressed!

So far, all I hear is Governor posturing taxpayers for raising more tax revenues! This would mask over out-of-control spending!

Dash

Richard Day said...

Dash:

You and I agree,at least generally, on the real solution. Fixing what's broken about Kentucky's current tax structure and creating a system that is more responsive to today's marketplace is the right way to go.

So long as Kentucky children don't have to wait until their school years are behind them for the legislature to pass a new tax code, I'm with you.

In the meantime, Draud is going to continue to talk about increasing revenues, right?

I hope Kentuckians will give legislators the courage they need to buck the powerful private interests that have kept true tax reform at bay.

Anonymous said...

The Principal writes, "As for the particular claim: Dick Innes, who comments above, calls KDE on the use of the statistic Draud quoted everytime they use it. Draud correctly says it comes from the NEA (NEA's 2007 Rankings & Statistics document"

You better reread your own main post. Draud writes in Business First that his bogus data came from the US Census. He never mentions the NEA. Where did you get the idea that Draud properly cites NEA as his data source?

Given the very different character of the NEA and the US Census Bureau, I think most of your readers will agree that this is a very erroneous attribution. It deserves to be highlighted every time the commissioner uses it.

What makes this especially ironic is that you have another post up that talks about kids who got thrown off an education cruise for making bad citations in a paper. Shouldn't our education commissioner set a better example?

Richard Day said...

Dick,

When you raised the issue, I asked KDE for a citation.

Richard

Anonymous said...

The Principal said...
"Dick,

When you raised the issue, I asked KDE for a citation."

I did too, months ago, when the first version of this article came out. I thought the problem was fixed until the same nonsense was released again just days ago.

Now, it obviously isn't fixed.